(iverson's) currentbuzz

News, journalism, the news business and its evolving transformation in a digital age

Archive for the ‘copyright’ tag

WordPress Themes Must be GPL

without comments

Image representing WordPress as depicted in Cr...
Image via CrunchBase

This is a simple explanation of how GNU’s GPL works for programs like WordPress, Drupal, etc. which are open source, but nonetheless licensed. It also contains a very clear explanation of why the php must be GPL, but also, how that doesn’t mean a theme or other GPL product can’t be commercial.

Please remember that this is about copyright and respecting the license that the WordPress copyright holders have chosen. It isn’t about money. Premium themes are fine. It is non-GPL themes (a.k.a. proprietary themes) that are the issue. Also realize that WordPress cannot change its license. It is forever locked to the GPL (version 2). Arguments along the lines of “WordPress should allow proprietary themes because of X,” are pointless. We are as much bound by the license as theme developers!

via Why WordPress Themes are Derivative of WordPress « Mark on WordPress.

 WordPress Themes Must be GPL

Written by Barbara K. Iverson

July 23rd, 2010 at 8:34 am

Don’t miss this: OVC presents Wireside Chat with Lawrence Lessig

without comments

Lawrence Lessig freesouls
Image via Wikipedia

The talk

The lecture by Lawrence Lessig will last 45 minutes, and will be followed by a 30 minute interactive Q & A session. The event will be moderated by Elizabeth Stark of the Open Video Alliance. Questions can be submitted using the hashtag #wireside.

This is a talk about copyright in a digital age, and the role (and importance) of a doctrine like “fair use.” Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, and is essential for commentary, criticism, news reporting, remix, research, teaching and scholarship with video.

via Open Video Alliance | Wireside Chat with Lawrence Lessig.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Written by Barbara K. Iverson

February 14th, 2010 at 3:54 pm

IFPI statement on copyright before Telenor Decision

with one comment

This is Google’s cache of http://www.ifpi.org/content/section_views/what_is_copyright.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Sep 6, 2009 17:32:50 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version

What is copyright?

Copyright is the means by which a person or a business makes a living from creativity. Copyright springs from a simple notion: the people that create, produce or invest in creative work should be the ones that decide how that work should be reproduced and made available to the public.

Enshrined in international law for more than 200 years, copyright provides the economic foundation for creating and disseminating music, literature, art, films, software, and other forms of creative works. Copyright also protects culture and fosters artistic integrity.

Copyright provides that the rights holders determine whether and how copying, distributing, broadcasting and other uses of their works take place. This gives talented people the incentive to create great works, and entrepreneurs the economic reasons to invest in them.

Copyright has underpinned an extraordinary modern economic success story, accounting for tens of millions of jobs worldwide. The dramatic growth of the artistic, cultural and other creative industries in today’s major economies would have been impossible without the strong levels of copyright protection that those countries have developed over many decades.

The latest available government estimates in Europe and the United States value copyright-based industries respectively at 360 billion Euros and US$430 billion, representing more than 5% of GDP. As we enter the age of electronic commerce, copyrighted material will be one of the most valuable commodities to be offered and sold on-line.

Copyright and the music industry

Copyright protects everyone involved in the music industry – from the aspiring artist to the successful best-seller, and from the local independent record company to the large multinational producer. It ensures that all the parties that have had a part in creating the music are rewarded for their work.

Copyright and similar rights protect the true value behind the sale of any musical recording – these rights represent and reward the creativity, sweat and toil of those who create and sell music. The proportion of the price of a CD or cassette accounted for by the cost of manufacturing the product is minimal. The real value is in the rights and the creativity that they protect.

The international recording industry is driven by dynamism and enterprise, but these would be meaningless in a world of inadequate copyright protection. Record companies invest billions of dollars of the industry’s total worldwide revenues in new artists, many of whom will never prove commercially successful. It is this culturally diverse bedrock of investment in new talent that weak copyright protection hurts most.

Copyright and the fight against piracy

SEE ALSO
What is piracy?

There are many different terms for it, but unauthorised copying and dissemination of copyrighted works is theft, pure and simple. Pirates are the enemy of creativity and all creators.

Piracy is the illegal copying of sound recordings, typically for financial gain. In the music industry, piracy represents a massive US$4.5 billion illicit enterprise, with ever-closer links to international organised crime.

Pirates thrive on weak copyright laws as well as on poor law enforcement. In today’s global economy, counterfeiters and other pirates are able to seek out havens of poor copyright protection and ineffective anti-piracy enforcement. The advent of the mass-produced CD has changed the face of piracy from a problem largely confined to local borders to a sophisticated international trade.

Copyright and the Internet

A new era of piracy on the internet poses potentially even greater problems than the proliferation of CD piracy.

The recording industry is fast entering the age of digital distribution. Technologies of music delivery are changing radically, bringing tremendous benefits to producer, distributor and consumer. To secure the same sort of protections in the on-line world that the music industry enjoys in the analogue world, copyright laws need updating.

The fundamental principles behind the laws, however, remain unchanged. Copyright laws must ensure that artists, composers and record producers are strongly protected from internet piracy. Rights holders also need to be able to use the technologies of the internet to manage and control the use of their works.

The international legal framework

SEE ALSO
Legal issues
International conventions
TRIPS

National laws in almost every country set forth the specific rights of authors, producers and performers of copyrighted works. International treaties also ensure that these creators are protected in countries other than their own.

The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works provides basic protections for authors, lyricists and composers internationally. The music industry also relies on treaties that specifically protect sound recordings, including the Rome Convention, the Geneva Phonograms Convention, and the WTO TRIPs Agreement.

The international legal framework for updating copyright laws for the digital era was laid down in two WIPO Treaties concluded in Geneva in December 1996, the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT). Signed by more than 100 countries, the treaties require ratification by 30 signatories in order to be come into force worldwide. At the start of the year 2000, approximately 13 states had ratified the treaties, and several other countries are working on their implementing legislation.

These search terms are highlighted: ifpi

Written by Barbara K. Iverson

November 8th, 2009 at 9:54 am

TV networks, government in So. Korea lead crack down on copyright infringement

without comments

According to a story in Korea Times, Korean television networks and the government are going to institute a new law that will allow the government to close websites and even to take away individual Internet accounts. While this might seem fair, the problem is that the definition of what is copyrighted content, is open enough that it would be easy to censor sites and users. This could be a threat to the democracy in So. Korea, where emotions are running high in the aftermath of the suicide of former President Roh Moo-hyun.

The reaction of the large crowds who gathered to mourn  former President Roh Moo-hyun to current President Lee Myun-bak’s appearance at Roh’s funeral was hostile, suggesting there might be those whom Lee would like to silence. A Buddhist altar in Roh’s hometown, Bongha, which was constructed according to tradition  as a Buddhist rite “49-je” and remains in place for 49 days to accomodate the soul of the deceased before reincarnation, was torn down by police, and though it has been rebuilt. The police plan to disperse mourners and may tear down the altar again if they believe the ceremony is turning into an anti-government demonstration.

…the country will enforce a new anti-file sharing provision that allows regulators to shut down Web sites after a third warning over copyright infringement, regardless of whether or not the copyright holders complained about it.

Internet users accused of illegally sharing copyrighted content will also be subject to the “three-strikes” rule, having their Web accounts severed. Critics argue that the new law could be abused as a censorship tool, due to its loose definition of “copyrighted content,” which could be anything from music and movies to news stories and blog postings.

via The Korea Times.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Written by Barbara K. Iverson

June 1st, 2009 at 3:57 pm

Not Smart: Warner Music Issues DMCA Takedown On Larry Lessig Presentation | Techdirt

without comments

Lawrence Lessig
Image via Wikipedia

Not Smart: Warner Music Issues DMCA Takedown On Larry Lessig Presentation | Techdirt.

“Lessig has announced that Warner Music issued a DMCA takedown on one of Lessig’s own presentations, in which his use is almost certainly fair use. Lessig, of course, is a lawyer, and a big supporter of fair use, so it’s no surprise that he’s also said he’s going to be fighting this. ”

As far as I can tell, this is the video presentation in question:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]